牟定| 宣汉| 曲沃| 红岗| 科尔沁右翼中旗| 巧家| 马鞍山| 代县| 连州| 涿州| 忠县| 巩义| 台山| 滕州| 若羌| 乌苏| 平邑| 永福| 乌兰浩特| 富顺| 洞头| 疏勒| 边坝| 方正| 秀屿| 长垣| 乐业| 翼城| 大理| 瓮安| 绥德| 江达| 扎兰屯| 衡南| 钓鱼岛| 岳池| 监利| 阳城| 大宁| 保亭| 景德镇| 宣威| 兴国| 滴道| 乐安| 洪雅| 明光| 翁源| 巍山| 秭归| 玉屏| 博罗| 博爱| 鹰手营子矿区| 吴忠| 南华| 杭锦后旗| 龙岗| 喀喇沁左翼| 西乡| 若尔盖| 繁昌| 岚皋| 灌南| 福泉| 龙泉| 浚县| 长春| 秦安| 华安| 同德| 德令哈| 龙海| 政和| 龙陵| 郴州| 建昌| 壶关| 荆门| 桐柏| 招远| 陵水| 绥滨| 温江| 庄浪| 代县| 廉江| 策勒| 英德| 双牌| 卫辉| 浑源| 五家渠| 永丰| 桓台| 黎川| 建德| 会理| 绥化| 南京| 东宁| 织金| 新龙| 大渡口| 河池| 宁阳| 若尔盖| 柳林| 万全| 澄江| 敦化| 尤溪| 定边| 依安| 陆良| 滦县| 三门| 石拐| 喀什| 太康| 郫县| 新都| 长沙| 柞水| 房县| 昭苏| 通江| 东安| 相城| 七台河| 江苏| 苏尼特左旗| 唐河| 海兴| 永吉| 广安| 永定| 阳谷| 阜新蒙古族自治县| 瑞丽| 方山| 石景山| 泾源| 崇明| 嘉义县| 齐齐哈尔| 水城| 安丘| 凌源| 连南| 黑河| 珠穆朗玛峰| 靖州| 弓长岭| 贺州| 北碚| 甘南| 金堂| 黑龙江| 龙川| 左贡| 朝阳市| 沾化| 扶风| 平罗| 融水| 疏附| 岳西| 佳木斯| 扎兰屯| 卢氏| 乌拉特前旗| 抚宁| 昌江| 齐河| 灵山| 青浦| 海城| 蕲春| 北宁| 崇信| 高台| 德江| 扎兰屯| 江永| 天水| 新河| 胶南| 新安| 集贤| 寿光| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 长春| 淮南| 故城| 叶县| 珊瑚岛| 常州| 峡江| 牟平| 邹平| 濉溪| 稻城| 罗山| 诏安| 原平| 张掖| 集安| 新荣| 武川| 桦川| 内丘| 清原| 山阳| 灞桥| 惠州| 曲水| 献县| 稷山| 南靖| 察隅| 和静| 兴宁| 双柏| 马山| 铜陵县| 哈密| 锡林浩特| 山阳| 韶关| 昔阳| 威县| 曲水| 临沧| 奉新| 扬中| 京山| 西畴| 鸡西| 德兴| 广元| 太和| 太白| 兴县| 吕梁| 博爱| 乌苏| 仪征| 阿克塞| 番禺| 富川| 玉林| 汉阴| 盐津| 青州| 新宾| 咸阳| 阜平| 巴林右旗| 涞源| 嘉鱼| 建湖| 辉县| 福泉| 创业
Global EditionASIA 中文双语Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Affordable solutions better than exaggerations

By Bjorn Lomborg | China Daily | Updated: 2019-09-21 08:09
[Photo/VCG]
武汉女人 央视网消息:在煤矿工作中,安全是天字号工程,关系到人民的切身利益和生命财产安全。 母婴在线 这样的暴力违法行径以及对它们的支持和纵容,是对民主、自由和法治的公然践踏。 创业资讯   三是认真贯彻落实党中央重要指示批示精神和重大决策部署,建立落实情况台账,确保件件有回应,事事有落实。 武汉论坛 新晃镇 创业资讯 型田 论坛资讯 新垌镇

Ahead of the Climate Action Summit that will bring together world leaders in New York on Sept 23, exaggeration about global warming is greater than ever. While some pundits continue, incorrectly, to insist that global warming is a made-up story, far more insist, also incorrectly, that we face an imminent climate crisis.

Adding to the polarization on the topic makes it impossible to engage in sensible policy discussion. For example, we are constantly told that climate change is to blame for an increase in extreme weather conditions such as flooding, droughts and cyclones. But the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has found the evidence does not support claims that floods, droughts and cyclones are increasing.

The scientists have said, "there is low confidence in a global-scale observed trend" in drought, a "lack of evidence regarding the sign of trend in the magnitude and/or frequency of floods on a global scale" and "no significant observed trends in global (cyclone) frequency over the past century."

What's more, the scientists have found that current human-caused global warming cannot reasonably be linked to any of these extreme weather phenomenon-"globally, there is low confidence in attribution of changes in (cyclone) activity to human influence", "low confidence in detection and attribution of changes in drought" and low confidence "that anthropogenic climate change has affected the frequency and magnitude of floods". This doesn't mean there is no problem-just that the facts matter.

What's behind the overblown rhetoric? Nearly three decades of policy failure. Promises made in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and the Kyoto Treaty in 1997 to reduce carbon emissions achieved little or nothing. Three years into the Paris climate treaty, just 17 countries are on track-including Samoa and Algeria which promised very little. In fact, since climate talks began in 1992, the world has emitted as much carbon dioxide from fossil fuels as all of humanity did before that from the beginning of time.

The reason for this persistent failure, and the cause of today's exaggerations, is that policies to cut carbon emissions are incredibly expensive. The Paris Agreement is likely to cost between $1 trillion and $2 trillion a year, making it the costliest treaty in history.

And it's eye wateringly expensive to cut net emissions to zero. Although many politicians casually promise this should be the goal, few dare ask how much it will cost. A report commissioned by the New Zealand government found that achieving "net zero" emissions by 2050 would cost that country more than its entire current annual national budget every single year, and that's a best-case scenario, with costs more realistically doubling to 32 percent of GDP.

Proponents of vastly expensive climate policies appear to believe that the only way to overcome these exorbitant costs with voters is by scaring people silly.

Unfortunately, this approach is unlikely to work. Not only is it turning climate unnecessarily into a more polarizing issue, but also it could damage the credibility of science, as research is being increasingly seen as a partisan attempt to push a particular policy rather than a disinterested search for truth.

Even as a political strategy, it seems destined to fail, for as costs mount, we will see more street protests such as those in France, or eventual ballot losses like those in Australia, Brazil and the Philippines as voters turn to politicians who promise to reverse expensive climate policies.

Compare proposals to spend many thousands of dollars on climate with a new survey showing nearly seven-in-10 Americans would vote against spending just $120 each per year to combat climate change.

There is a far more sensible approach: Instead of scaring voters to accept fossil fuels costing more, we should innovate the price of green energy-when it becomes cheaper than coal and oil, everyone would switch.

Since the 1980s, OECD countries' spending on low-carbon research and development has slid from 0.06 percent of GDP to less than 0.03 percent. We can (and should) invest a lot more on green R&D. It would be much cheaper than current policies and be much more likely to succeed.

We can only reclaim the pragmatic center of the debate if we stop accepting the relentless climate exaggerations. Climate change is a problem, and it needs a smart and cost-conscious solution in order to address it.

The author is president of the Copenhagen Consensus Center. The views don't necessarily represent those of China Daily.

  
Most Viewed in 24 Hours
China Views
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
官兜 孟达乡 赤祭塘 仝庄村 后俸伯村 夏店村 黄武村 歙县 贵池区
天连小学 东赵店村委会 石井铺乡 大渡口 前苏桥村 白芒林场 麻生圐圙村 龙岗 宗寨村委会
琅琊路小学 斋堂 凉水井镇 宣化店镇 河古庙镇 体育南路 定福庄乡政府 寺河乡 高古庄村 诗元村
https://www.whr.cc/bbsitemap.htm